Bitcoin’s environmental impact remains a topic of heated debate, but new research is challenging long-held assumptions. ESG researcher Daniel Batten says nine widely cited claims about Bitcoin mining are contradicted by scientific evidence.

According to Batten, peer-reviewed studies and grid-level data present a more nuanced picture. He noted that criticism often stems from limited understanding of how modern energy systems operate.

Over recent years, major media outlets have argued that Bitcoin mining strains power grids and raises electricity costs. However, Batten emphasized that these claims lack empirical support.

Why Bitcoin Mining Does Not Destabilize Power Grids

One of the most persistent myths is that Bitcoin’s resource use scales with transaction volume. Batten explained that multiple studies have disproved this assumption.

Research summarized in the University of Cambridge’s Digital Mining Industry Report shows that Bitcoin’s energy consumption is largely independent of transaction count. This allows the network to scale without increasing resource use.

Batten also rejected claims that mining destabilizes grids. In practice, flexible mining loads can stabilize renewable-heavy grids by absorbing excess generation and reducing curtailment.

Electricity Prices and Carbon Footprint

Another common argument suggests that Bitcoin miners drive up electricity prices for consumers. Batten stated that no peer-reviewed study supports this claim.

In some regions, mining has contributed to lower prices by improving grid efficiency. The expert also challenged comparisons between Bitcoin and national energy consumption, calling them misleading.

According to Batten, Bitcoin mining produces no direct emissions. Its footprint is limited to indirect electricity-related emissions, and the industry has already surpassed a 50% sustainable energy threshold.

Proof-of-Work and Renewable Energy Adoption

Batten also addressed the assumption that proof-of-stake systems are inherently greener. He argued that equating lower energy use with lower environmental impact is misleading.

Proof-of-work mining can mitigate methane emissions, support renewable infrastructure, and monetize otherwise wasted energy. Studies show mining significantly reduces renewable energy curtailment.

As Batten concluded, labeling Bitcoin mining as “wasteful” reflects a value judgment rather than an objective assessment. Data increasingly suggests the technology can support energy transition goals.

Read also: AI Energy Use Surpasses Bitcoin Mining in 2024